Re: Johnson/Evinrude (E/J) 4 or Nissan 5 HP?

From: SolarFry@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 12:50:07 PST


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
        West Wight Potter Mailing List maintainer
                dfarrell@ridgecrest.ca.us
           List hosted by www.tscnet.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thanks for reply.
 
 I appreciate it.

 The Nissan 5HP also has reverse, the e/j 4 has only n/fwd. I am quite
concerned about the weight though..
 
 Best
 SF
 
 In a message dated 3/27/00 12:31:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, mcmd@innet.com
writes:
 
 << Greetings, all:
  I cannot recommend the Evinrude / Johnson 4HP 2-cylinder 2 cycle, even
  though its specs are attractive. I've now owned 2. The older one, circa
  mid seventies was a delight, always started eventually, and even ran under
  load (on a bet, when I was trading it in on a new 92) for over an hour with
  no water pump impeller.
  
  But the new one was another story. First, no manual rope starting
  capability; the spring rewind was a sealed unit, so when the sash cord broke
  it was $65.00 for a new recoil start unit. Plus you were through for the
  day. Older model had exposed flywheel with notch which allowed starting with
  recoil system kaput. Also, replaceable spring was about 7.00 and sash cord
  was free. Also, 92 was very sensitive to carburetor gum formation,
  something the 76apparently didn't know about. Prop on the 92 was plastic
  vice metal on the 76.
  
  92 did have the neat saddle tank I described earlier, and had a neutral
  gear. Both plusses.
  Hope this helps,
  Mac Davis
  Kelpie, WWP19#804
  Aripeka, FL >>
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 03:27:13 PST