Re: keel bashing or shot peening?

Mac Davis (mcmd@innet.com)
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:49:29 -0400


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
West Wight Potter Website at URL
http://www.lesbois.com/wwpotter/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi Jim:
TINS. A product that does what you are describing exists. It is called
"riblet film" and was given some credit for Dennis Conner's America's Cup
victory in Perth. If I remember correctly, it was made by 3M.
Regards,
Mac

----- Original Message -----
From: james nolan <nolan_laboratories@email.msn.com>
To: potter mail list <wwpotter@tscnet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 1:32 PM
Subject: keel bashing or shot peening?

> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> West Wight Potter Website at URL
> http://www.lesbois.com/wwpotter/
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Since it's now popular to bash the keel with a sledgehammer I wonder about
> the following possibilty. A golf ball is dimpled to allow it fly a much
> greater distance than a smooth ball. The dimples separate the boundary
> condition on the ball's surface (air velocity at ball's surface is zero
with
> respect to the ball) from the laminar flow of the surrounding air. This
> decreases the wind resistance. If I bash my keel with the peen end of a
ball
> peen hammer or better yet shot peen it with cannon balls (or Rye's big
iron
> balls) , I'll cover the surface with dimples. Will my potter go faster?
Will
> the compass work better?
>
> Jim Nolan
>
>